Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 09/17/2014 11:32 (09/17/2014 11:32) |
| Message-ID | <slrnm1ilpd.1j5.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | nospam (41m) Eric Stevens (15h & 4m) > Sandman |
In article <p9ki1a5t2urc3vp30n1rddb10l9fn0njaa@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:
Floyd has no idea what he's talking about, so as soon as someone knows what they're talking about, they're by definition not talking about whatever it is Floyd is babbling about.nospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.
who cares.what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.Eric Stevens
So you accept that you are not talking about the same thing that Floyd was talking about, and that you don't care.
-- Sandman[.net]
09/13/2014-
