Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 09/17/2014 08:32 (09/16/2014 22:32) |
Message-ID | <87iokmycye.fld@barrow.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
nospamThe OP and everyone who is interested in the topic at hand.
In article <sf2i1a1ai44fng06d14caf73520h0h9bd0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.
who cares.
what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.That's why nobody calls it a reversible workflow except you?
a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.