Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
Google Google
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date09/21/2014 01:24 (09/21/2014 11:24)
Message-ID<t03s1atqlub50ec92bu1u73pra4ettn4th@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsSandman
Followupsnospam (15m) > Eric Stevens
Sandman (11h & 7m) > Eric Stevens
On 20 Sep 2014 11:12:12 GMT, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:

Sandman
In article <j1op1atl8evat6nqt8a91mrt2mr490b8pu@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
Floyd's usage is strictly in accordance with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_process_%28thermodynamics%29 as it applies information theory. If you think there is no room for reversible processes in information theory see http://tinyurl.com/otp5pug

nospam
since when does editing digital images on a computer become a thermodynamics problem?

Sandman
Since half past never.

Eric Stevens
Wrong.

Sandman
I.e. correct.

Eric Stevens
See my reply to nospam.

Sandman
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.

Eric Stevens
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e

Sandman
You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way.

"Maximum entropy method in image processing".

Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.

Google is not your friend, Eric.

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

Google
nospam (15m) > Eric Stevens
Sandman (11h & 7m) > Eric Stevens