Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Sandman |
Date | 09/21/2014 12:41 (09/21/2014 12:41) |
Message-ID | <slrnm1tbbn.uqn.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Savageduck (2h & 39m) Eric Stevens (12h & 4m) > Sandman |
Which is irrelevant, since no one in this thread has talked about a reversible process as used in physics.Eric Stevensnospam
It's just that it's not fully reversible in the strict sense that Floyd used it.
it is, but in a different way.two different uses of the term.the problem is that he won't acknowledge there can be other meanings because he's never used the software in question and is talking out his ass.Eric Stevens
There is no other meaning which can be applied to the term 'fully reversible' as used in physics.
In using those words in that way he was expressing a particular rigorously defined meaning for which there is no substitute.Yes, we know you want to make Floyd appear to be an even bigger moron than he is, but he needs no help.