Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/20/2014 12:45 (09/20/2014 22:45) |
Message-ID | <2mmq1a9hr1u148oq74p2e8uakjsso376cv@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (4h & 10m) |
nospamArgued? I laughed at the joke of it. --
In article <us2q1atm4bqd1lhphqu8c1m5h6stcmmp2h@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensnospamEric StevensnospamEric Stevensnospam1 & 2 are two separate solutions. thus the word 'or'.Eric Stevens
Even solution 1 is a form of getting it to the outside.
no it isn't. the antenna is internal in 1 and external in 2.
I'm glad you have finally worked that in 2 your internal antennae is external.
you're either really dense or you just like to argue.
if the antenna is on the outside, then it is not on the inside.
Duh!
so why are you arguing otherwise?
Who? Me?
Read what you originally wrote.
what part confused you?
clearly something did, otherwise you wouldn't have argued.