Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 09/18/2014 05:25 (09/18/2014 15:25) |
| Message-ID | <psjk1apg1qvs66hku8ri8cmv3sl308ksc7@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | Sandman (5h & 12m) > Eric Stevens |
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 06:13:40 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamI don't know of any operations in Photoshop which are reversible in the strict sense that Floyd was using the term. Some aaspects of smart objects might be, but I don't know enough about them yet to venture an opinion. --
In article <3qki1allrd41jsqkih658nt3lof67bh3er@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamSavageduckEric Stevens
If you make the adjustments in Photoshop with a non-destructive workflow there is no use of sidecar files or catalog entries as in Lightroom.
True, but this has nothing to do with whether a process is reversible or not.
if it can be reversed, then it's reversible.
since you finally agree that adjustments made in photoshop can be reversed, then it's reversible.
Regards,
Eric Stevens
09/13/2014-
