nospam
In article <lvo03q1128p@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:

PeterN
And your documents to prove hime wrong are:

nospam
in the above link. duh. are you that stupid?

there are other references, but that one will suffice.

PeterN
It so happens that I often switch between LAB and RGB, and have never see a loss.

nospam
just because you can't see a difference doesn't mean there isn't a difference.

there's no visible loss with jpg at its highest setting, so according to you, jpeg is lossless.

idiot.

PeterN
talking to yourself again. I ask for proof and you call me names. There is an obvious conclusion to be draw.

nospam
the obvious conclusion is that you are a blithering idiot.

the proof is in the link and has already been pointed out more than once. it's a simple thing to do. have you done it? no. instead, you spew nonsense, demonstrating just how much of an idiot you are.

PeterN
You made a statement, I asked for proof, and you trun to pejoratives.

nospam
proof was provided.

if you aren't going to bother reading it (even before you asked) and doing what it describes, then my response is very appropriate and not pejorative at all.

PeterN
No 132 "proof was provided."

nospam
it was.

PeterN
I knew tht answer before you posted it. Though posssibly you might have used "you wouldn't understand it."

nospam
you don't.

PeterN
Since you htink I am hat dumb, in the interesting of communicationg, restate your "proof."

nospam
read the link eric provided.

either it's over your head or you'd rather argue.

<https://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ColorCorrection/ACT-LAB-dam age.htm>