Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/20/2014 04:35 (09/20/2014 14:35) |
Message-ID | <3upp1a92iv73and7clr2pdqojn59b4tfpf@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (2m) > Eric Stevens |
nospamTHank you for your clarification.
In article <vndp1a5mip0ansj4biruf9of16t22sqvkm@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensnospamSandmanEric StevensEric Stevensnospam
And I have pointed out that you cannot reverse a change which has not actually been made. Even if it is reversible, you can't reverse something before you have done it.
the change *has* been made, just not to the pixels themselves.
And to what has the change been made?
To the pixels. nospam is incorrect here. All LR adjustments are applied to a preview file and saved to disk.
the changes are rendered on the fly and may be cached to disk (which is the preview file you're talking about). the latter is optional.
What do you exactly mean by 'on the fly'.
not again.
do you not learn anything from the numerous multi-hundred-post threads?
--nospamit is not a pixel editor.Eric Stevens
It can't make changes to the pixels and not be a pixel editor. Something is wrong here.
nothing is wrong and it can.