Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
From | nospam |
Date | 10/13/2014 08:24 (10/13/2014 02:24) |
Message-ID | <131020140224443843%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | PeterN |
Followups | PeterN (10h & 4m) > nospam |
take your own advice, do learn to read. i didn't say anything about speeding up workflow at all.PeterNPeterNnospam
The fact is that very little can be done in any plug-in that can't be done in PS.
completely false.
if that were the case, then there would be no need for plug-ins.
Bad logic. Some plug-ins allow for faster processing. Also, do learn to read, I said nothing about speeding up workflow.
i've forgotten more about lab that you'll ever know.PeterNAlmost anything can be done in both RGB & LAB. LAB is a lot easie, and faster for some processes.nospam
very few and not without a cost.
You just don't know how to use lAB, and won't admit that.
then why are you annoyed?PeterNthat gives more flexability, which is a good thing. Getting into a tool war, is meaningless, unless there is a reasonable accurate description of what eah plug-in does.nospam
Habing said that, I am annoyed that the oil paint filter was removed from CC 2014.
third party opportunity.
Yup