Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/18/2014 17:52 (09/18/2014 11:52) |
Message-ID | <180920141152046287%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Sandman (1h & 47m) Eric Stevens (6h & 41m) > nospam |
learn to read before you say more stupid stuff.Eric StevensnospamFloyd L. DavidsonFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
Sandman and nospam remind me of a kid named Danny that went through grade school with me. In the second grade we did spelling lists every week. The "test" was the teacher read off the words, and we wrote them down, and then we "corrected" our own list. The teacher went down the list and spelled each word in turn.
Every time the teacher spelling it different than Danny, he would excitedly raise his hand and start saying, "Miss Finholm, you made a 'stake." She would, every time, have to convince him that his spelling actually was wrong.
actually that describes you perfectly.
you hone in on irrelevant details, such as revertible versus reversible versus undo, and worse, you get it *wrong*.
Your comment does not support your claim.
it does, and i can dig up many of your posts to prove it.
however, from memory, you said some things a year or so ago about mac and windows that were totally false and laughably so.
some time before that, maybe two years ago, you said there could never be an internal wifi antenna on an slr because the camera body is metal. that too is wrong. there are over a billion devices with a metal body, including laptops, tablets and smartphones, and work just fine with wifi. all it takes is an antenna aperture or putting the antenna on the outside rather than the inside (and still not visible). it's trivial to do.
Gee! An internal antennae works fine as long as it's on the outside.