Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/18/2014 06:41 (09/18/2014 00:41) |
Message-ID | <180920140041540453%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
that would be you.Floyd L. DavidsonSavageduckEric StevensEric StevensSavageduck
No one who understood what we were trying to talk about would claim that a JPG conversion is a reversible process.
Â...but that genius Floyd did.
I've had a look and I cant see where. Could you refer me to the message?
With pleasure.
That wasnâEUR(Tm)t too tough to find: Posted: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:44:18 -0500 Message ID: <8738bs2076.fld@barrow.com>
Wherein Floyd stated the following:
âEURoeA non-destructive workflow means you can *undo* and then *redo*.
That is not a reversible function.
For example, you can add sharpening with a high pass sharpen tool to an image, save it as a JPEG, send it to someone else, and they can use a blur tool to reverse the sharpen.
If the sharpening is done with UnsharpMask that cannot be done. USM is not reversible.âEUR
Note, the words, âEURoesave it as a JPEG,âEUR.
As I said, that genius Floyd did.
So we now we know you can't read.
What I said was that *high pass sharpen is reversible*. It is, even if a few people are unable to either understand or accept that it is.in a non-destructive workflow, *everything* is reversible.