Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

PeterN
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromPeterN
Date09/20/2014 21:54 (09/20/2014 15:54)
Message-ID<lvklve11ued@news4.newsguy.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
Followupsnospam (1h & 15m) > PeterN

On 9/19/2014 12:51 PM, nospam wrote:

nospam
In article <lvha2q05ld@news4.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:

once again, in a non-destructive workflow, unsharp mask along with everything else *is* reversible. this is a fact no matter how much you and floyd argue otherwise.

Eric Stevens
It's not a reversible process as it is conventionally defined.

nospam
yes it is.

someone can unsharp mask today and remove it tomorrow and put it back the day after that.

the following week, that same someone can remove all colour (convert to b/w) and the week after that, can reverse that, exactly how it was in the original image, because it *is* the original image.

that's what just about everyone would call reversible.

PeterN
Another twist. Go purchase some more eggs. they will not be scrambled.

nospam
there is no twisting and you clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

scrambling eggs is not a non-destructive workflow and nobody ever said it was.

if you think scrambling eggs is non-destructive, then you're far dumber than i thought, which is already rather dumb.

Learn to read. You might even learn something. I strongly suspect that yu have a list of arguments that you make, whether or not they are appplicable.

-- PeterN

nospam (1h & 15m) > PeterN