Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/17/2014 07:29 (09/17/2014 01:29) |
| Message-ID | <170920140129007277%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Floyd L. Davidson (1h & 3m) Eric Stevens (3h & 47m) |
In article <sf2i1a1ai44fng06d14caf73520h0h9bd0@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
who cares.Eric StevensFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.
what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.
a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.
09/13/2014-
