Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/21/2014 04:42 (09/21/2014 14:42) |
Message-ID | <7ies1alb7eqr1egn8gmjajp53in4g95tto@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Savageduck |
Followups | nospam (16m) > Eric Stevens Sandman (8h & 13m) > Eric Stevens |
SavageduckHow do you think Adobe optimises the alignment of shots when constructing a panorama from a collection of images? --
On 2014-09-21 01:33:01 +0000, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>said:Eric StevensSavageduck
On Sat, 20 Sep 2014 18:07:04 -0700, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com>wrote:SavageduckEric Stevens
On 2014-09-20 23:39:49 +0000, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>said:nospamSavageduck
In article <t03s1atqlub50ec92bu1u73pra4ettn4th@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e
You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way.
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".
Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".
Going into video encoding are you? Whatever happened to the affection for JPEGs?