Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/20/2014 02:32 (09/19/2014 20:32) |
Message-ID | <190920142032352320%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 1m) |
it's *always* rendered from the original image data.Eric StevensnospamSandman
it is not a pixel editor.
Sure it is, only in another sense than old Photoshop. Every single adjustment you make in LR are applied to the pixels and saved to disk as a preview image. Difference is that the original file is always kept intact so every step is fully reversible.
It's not made to the original image: it's made to what I have described as a (reduced size) simulacrum of the original image.
nobody said that could be done.SandmanEric Stevens
In fact - using smart filters in Photoshop is *less* of a pixel editor than LR these days, because the pixels are never touched, it's all kept in RAM and the resulting image is never saved to disk until you export/save it. Also, fully reversible of course. :)
With few exceptions, once you have made the changes and saved/exported the image, you cannot reverse the changes *in*the*exported/saved*image*.