Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/19/2014 21:34 (09/19/2014 15:34) |
| Message-ID | <190920141534087942%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Savageduck (2h & 28m) > nospam Sandman (12h & 22m) > nospam |
In article <slrnm1ovjl.d9b.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
that's new and not always visible and merely a shortcut for a new layer.SandmanSandmannospam
I.e. if you open a photo in Photoshop and click the Levels button in the palette, which is the easiest way to apply a levels adjustment, it's fully reversible. Only if you select Image ->Adjustments ->Levels do you get a levels adjustments that isn't reversible.
the easiest way to do levels is pick levels in the adjustments menu which is not reversible.
How is that the easiest way when the levels button is right there on screen?
the menu choice for levels has been there forever. command/control-l, for levels.
they aren't.SandmannospamnospamSandman
iphoto is not non-destructive. it makes a copy of an image when you change it and writes the changes to the copy.
I.e. exactly like Lightroom. LR has a better UI for enabling and disabling effects, but the process is the same.
iphoto is nothing at all like lightroom, other than casually in that they manage assets.
They are non-destructive in exactly the same way, which is what I was commenting on.
iphoto makes a second copy of any changes. it doesn't maintain a database of changes.
with lightroom, you can change anything at any time, regardless of session.nospamSandman
if you quit, it's not available.
It's because "revert to previous" undo's all the edits you've done in one session.
no, it's not.SandmanIt's not as sophisticated as LR or Aperture, of course, but it is 100% non-destructive.nospam
it's not even close to either.
As far as non-destrictivness goes - it's identical.
09/13/2014-
