Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/21/2014 01:39 (09/20/2014 19:39) |
| Message-ID | <200920141939497866%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (45m) > nospam Savageduck (1h & 27m) |
In article <t03s1atqlub50ec92bu1u73pra4ettn4th@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.Eric StevensSandmanSandmanEric Stevens
Nothing in your reply makes image processing be the same as thermodynamics, Eric. You're blathering about things you know nothing about.
See http://tinyurl.com/mbrhs3e
You failed again. Are you jusyt wildly googling and hoping that something will support your incorrect claims? Seems that way.
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".
Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.
09/13/2014-
