Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/20/2014 07:09 (09/20/2014 17:09) |
Message-ID | <us2q1atm4bqd1lhphqu8c1m5h6stcmmp2h@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (2m) > Eric Stevens |
nospamWho? Me?
In article <n0pp1a1o3f8l7ll7dg62oec1c43g2u8hc5@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:nospamEric StevensnospamEric Stevensnospam1 & 2 are two separate solutions. thus the word 'or'.Eric Stevens
Even solution 1 is a form of getting it to the outside.
no it isn't. the antenna is internal in 1 and external in 2.
I'm glad you have finally worked that in 2 your internal antennae is external.
you're either really dense or you just like to argue.
if the antenna is on the outside, then it is not on the inside.
Duh!
so why are you arguing otherwise?