Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/19/2014 04:55 (09/18/2014 22:55) |
Message-ID | <180920142255314696%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 13m) > nospam |
designing the product.Eric StevensnospamEric StevensnospamnospamEric Stevens
some time before that, maybe two years ago, you said there could never be an internal wifi antenna on an slr because the camera body is metal. that too is wrong. there are over a billion devices with a metal body, including laptops, tablets and smartphones, and work just fine with wifi. all it takes is an antenna aperture or putting the antenna on the outside rather than the inside (and still not visible). it's trivial to do.
Gee! An internal antennae works fine as long as it's on the outside.
learn to read before you say more stupid stuff.
i never said an internal antenna is on the outside.
" ... putting the antenna on the outside rather than the inside ... "
that is *after* the word 'or'.
do you not understand what 'or' means?nospamdo you see the word 'or' in there?? what do you think 'or' means?Eric Stevens
It means you should have thought a little before writing that. :-)
what i wrote is perfectly clear.
nevertheless, since you're having trouble, here it is again:
all it takes is 1) an antenna aperture or 2) putting the antenna on the outside rather than the inside it's trivial to do
What is the 'it' that "is all it takes'?
I know: " ... getting an internal antennae to work ... "no it isn't. the antenna is internal in 1 and external in 2.nospamEric Stevens
1 & 2 are two separate solutions. thus the word 'or'.
Even solution 1 is a form of getting it to the outside.