Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | nospam |
Date | 09/18/2014 06:41 (09/18/2014 00:41) |
Message-ID | <180920140041560584%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Floyd L. Davidson |
Followups | Eric Stevens (4h & 37m) > nospam |
it does, and i can dig up many of your posts to prove it.Floyd L. DavidsonFloyd L. Davidsonnospam
Sandman and nospam remind me of a kid named Danny that went through grade school with me. In the second grade we did spelling lists every week. The "test" was the teacher read off the words, and we wrote them down, and then we "corrected" our own list. The teacher went down the list and spelled each word in turn.
Every time the teacher spelling it different than Danny, he would excitedly raise his hand and start saying, "Miss Finholm, you made a 'stake." She would, every time, have to convince him that his spelling actually was wrong.
actually that describes you perfectly.
you hone in on irrelevant details, such as revertible versus reversible versus undo, and worse, you get it *wrong*.
Your comment does not support your claim.
Moreover, the reversible nature of sharpen tools vs other types of processes is important to the OP, even if some folks never aspire to a level of photography where it becomes important.another one of your insults.