Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Sandman |
Date | 09/22/2014 14:15 (09/22/2014 14:15) |
Message-ID | <slrnm2057f.671.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
It's the other way around, Eric. You're the one that needs to convince others that you have the first clue. Every single thing you've said in this thread has been shot down.Eric StevensEric StevensSandman
Dunno about Gaussian blur but they seem to be heavily into this sort of thing in their advanced output techniques. See http://tinyurl.com/p2l3u9x It's built into Photoshop for the user to get at. I'm surprised you didn't know that.
Why can't you READ, Eric? I am asking you to show me how Adobe applies *THERMODYNAMICS* in *IMAGE PROCESSING*. I'm using caps here, perhaps it'll be easier for you to read?
First, convince me you are capable of understanding. How far does your present knowledge extend.
Made what up? I'm correctly stating that a book from him isn't information from Adobe. And this is your reply? Seriously?SandmanEric Stevens
And a book by Brad Dayley is not information from Adobe, you confused old man.
Are you saying he made it up?
The truth of the matter is that you were not previously aware of the use within Photoshop and have been caught flat footed. Now all you have left is abuse and bluster.The use of...what? Thermodynamics? You're right, I wasn't previously aware of that, and I am currently not aware of that, since you have been hilariously unable to substantiate that claim of yours.