Google| Subject | Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening) |
| From | PeterN |
| Date | 10/13/2014 03:49 (10/12/2014 21:49) |
| Message-ID | <m1fb3p01a50@news4.newsguy.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (4h & 34m) > PeterN |
On 10/11/2014 12:20 AM, nospam wrote:
nospamBad logic. Some plug-ins allow for faster processing. Also, do learn to read, I said nothing about speeding up workflow.
In article <m16hrf01hl4@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:PeterNnospam
The fact is that very little can be done in any plug-in that can't be done in PS.
completely false.
if that were the case, then there would be no need for plug-ins.
You just don't know how to use lAB, and won't admit that.PeterNnospam
Almost anything can be done in both RGB & LAB. LAB is a lot easie, and faster for some processes.
very few and not without a cost.
Yup -- PeterNPeterNnospam
that gives more flexability, which is a good thing. Getting into a tool war, is meaningless, unless there is a reasonable accurate description of what eah plug-in does.
Habing said that, I am annoyed that the oil paint filter was removed from CC 2014.
third party opportunity.
09/13/2014-
