Skip to main content
news

Re: Is RGB to Lab lossy? -...

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was(Re: Lenses and sharpening)
FromEric Stevens
Date10/08/2014 01:08 (10/08/2014 12:08)
Message-ID<kfs83apc3bt014o2v44jpjs66r33g0gk19@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam

On Tue, 07 Oct 2014 17:26:29 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <m0sskh02g2i@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:

Eric Stevens
For some reason the conversion of RGB -->Lab has been particularly singled out for criticism in this respect.

nospam
it's a bad workflow because what can be done with an rgb->lab-rgb conversion can be done *without* the conversion and with better results.

PeterN
Yes it can be done in RGB, but with a lot more effort.

nospam
nope. it's less effort and with higher quality results in rgb since you don't need to make two lossy conversions. it's also quicker.

The conversions are not significantly lossy: certainly not in comparison with the changes you are about to wreak on the image. As te whether or not it's quicker: it maybe, but it depends on what you are trying to achieve.

PeterN
Take a simple example stock photo and change the color in RGB, and then make the same color change in LAB.

nospam
that's meaningless. change the colour to what?

PeterN
Or, simply increase color saturation n RGB and make the same change in LAB.

nospam
there is absolutely *no* need to go to lab to change saturation.

PeterN
All yo do is sout questionable theory. Show some real life proof.

nospam
there's nothing questionable about it.

read something *other* than the crap marguilis spouts and learn something new for once.

--

Regards,

Eric Stevens