Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/22/2014 11:43 (09/22/2014 21:43) |
Message-ID | <nprv1atpf8bk2punnsr4cc2jef49pbefmd@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (2h & 21m) |
SandmanNevertheless, your views about why I asked the question are quite wrong. --
In article <0kdu1ad0vrvdhcprkbhke1vc68ju103drm@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:SandmanEric StevensSandmanEric StevensSandmannospamEric Stevens
questions like this mean you don't understand how it works.
it *always* uses the original data. the cached previews are a speed optimization for the user interface.
That's why I asked him that particular question.
No, you asked it because you have no clue how LR works.
I don't know why you don't bother writing my posts for me: you seem to know *exactly* what I really meant. :-(
No, I am telling you the reason why you asked a question, not what you "meant". The reason for the question was ignorance on your part.
I generally ask questions because of something I don't know.
And you should. But that's not what you told nospam, still quoted above. You told him that "that's why I asked him that particular question" as a reply to nospam's claim about LR always using the original data. You didn't ask me that question because you didn't know. But you should have.