Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | Eric Stevens |
| Date | 09/20/2014 05:26 (09/20/2014 15:26) |
| Message-ID | <lhsp1atceq8is7jjri2s52jqukk40abvng@4ax.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | nospam |
| Followups | nospam (25m) > Eric Stevens |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:43:50 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
nospamGood Lord. What on earth do you think I have been doing!
In article <dlip1atj87lout9dl7fl5eje2uaddfdril@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:Eric Stevensnospam
When I (and Floyd) say 'fully reversible' we are using a very specific meaning.
and everyone else is using a different meaning, one which both of you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge.
Floyd used a very specific meaning the significance of which you have been ignoring from the outset. You have insisted in trying to force on him an entirely different meaning which, if accepted, would have him saying something entirely different. But you have turned your face away from what he was trying to say ... --
Regards,
Eric Stevens
09/13/2014-
