Sandman
In article <u5ak1apeae5nav13mgprk2hojbr016ttqt@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Floyd L. Davidson
That is a good move on your part. Start sticking with what Adobe calls it, and in the process use appropriate terms.

nospam
adobe didn't come up with the name. it's what everyone calls it, because it's non-destructive.

Eric Stevens
But that doesn't make the processes employed reversible.

nospam
who cares.

what matters is the results, not micromanaging every step of the way.

a non-destructive workflow is reversible. period.

Eric Stevens
So you accept that you are not talking about the same thing that Floyd was talking about, and that you don't care.

Sandman
Floyd has no idea what he's talking about, so as soon as someone knows what they're talking about, they're by definition not talking about whatever it is Floyd is babbling about.

Eric Stevens
On this occasion, at least, Floyd most certainly knows what he is talking about.

Sandman
Haha, no.

Eric Stevens
A problem seems to be that very few other people seem to.

Sandman
Well, we all know that YOU rarely have the first clue about what you're talking about, so I have no problem understanding why you're here supporting ignorant Floyd.