Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
From | Eric Stevens |
Date | 09/22/2014 23:48 (09/23/2014 09:48) |
Message-ID | <t4612at80kipl6jni5uku4p64acvl97qlm@4ax.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | nospam |
Followups | nospam (38m) > Eric Stevens PeterN (1d & 16m) |
nospamHe probably didn't notice that the tail of the URL had wrapped.
In article <lvpc9u01no0@news6.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter@verizon.net> wrote:nospamPeterNnospamPeterNnospamPeterNnospamthe proof is in the link and has already been pointed out more than once. it's a simple thing to do. have you done it? no. instead, you spew nonsense, demonstrating just how much of an idiot you are.PeterN
You made a statement, I asked for proof, and you trun to pejoratives.
proof was provided.
if you aren't going to bother reading it (even before you asked) and doing what it describes, then my response is very appropriate and not pejorative at all.
No 132 "proof was provided."
it was.PeterNnospam
I knew tht answer before you posted it. Though posssibly you might have used "you wouldn't understand it."
you don't.
Since you htink I am hat dumb, in the interesting of communicationg, restate your "proof."
read the link eric provided.
either it's over your head or you'd rather argue.
<https://www.ledet.com/margulis/ACT_postings/ColorCorrection/ACT-LAB-damage.htm>
Typical error 404
it worked for you the first time.
either that or you're lying.