Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromSandman
Date09/18/2014 17:07 (09/18/2014 17:07)
Message-ID<slrnm1ltqa.93o.mr@irc.sandman.net>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
FollowsEric Stevens
FollowupsEric Stevens (6h & 21m) > Sandman
In article <fe7l1a9qgalhhov3a460vmrue9jfa0lq9k@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens wrote:

Eric Stevens
On this occasion, at least, Floyd most certainly knows what he is talking about.

Sandman
Haha, no.

Eric Stevens
A problem seems to be that very few other people seem to.

Sandman
Well, we all know that YOU rarely have the first clue about what you're talking about, so I have no problem understanding why you're here supporting ignorant Floyd.

Eric Stevens
Floyd's usage is strictly in accordance with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_process_%28thermodynamics%29

Great input, if the topic had been about thermodynamics.

as it applies information theory. If you think there is no room for reversible processes in information theory see http://tinyurl.com/otp5pug

Why can't you read?

1. Floyd thinks that HPS + JPG compression can be reversed. It can not. 2. Floyd thinks that a non-destructive workflow is not a reversible process, it is.

Just the plain facts.

-- Sandman[.net]

Google
Eric Stevens (6h & 21m) > Sandman