Skip to main content
news

Re: Lenses and sharpening

Eric Stevens
SubjectRe: Lenses and sharpening
FromEric Stevens
Date09/18/2014 11:07 (09/18/2014 21:07)
Message-ID<p38l1ahdn5d4hqj2f23g3poskolprrir91@4ax.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam
FollowupsFloyd L. Davidson (31m)
Sandman (6h & 39m) > Eric Stevens

On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 01:19:09 -0400, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

nospam
In article <lbqk1adl3p9v8m9gj7jen4cbmlum8a7k2f@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:

Savageduck
If you make the adjustments in Photoshop with a non-destructive workflow there is no use of sidecar files or catalog entries as in Lightroom.

Eric Stevens
True, but this has nothing to do with whether a process is reversible or not.

Sandman
Of course it does. Non-destructive adjustments means they are reversible.

Eric Stevens
Not in the strictly technical sense in which Floyd was using the term.

nospam
that's the whole problem.

floyd cannot acknowledge that there are other completely valid meanings.

Eric Stevens
If you want to argue with what he said then you have to use the same meaning that he did.

nospam
i used the common meaning of the term reversible.

he is using his own narrow definition and intentionally dismissing *anything* else.

Because the narrow meaning expresses *exactly* what he intends. Your preferred broad meaning encompasses many alternatives. Hence this argument. --

Regards,

Eric Stevens