Google| Subject | Re: Lenses and sharpening |
| From | nospam |
| Date | 09/21/2014 04:58 (09/20/2014 22:58) |
| Message-ID | <200920142258121998%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
| Follows | Eric Stevens |
| Followups | Eric Stevens (2h & 15m) |
In article <8oes1ap1h8kjpoc18oghp2jjtpphorv9iu@4ax.com>, Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz>wrote:
you have that backwards.Eric StevensnospamEric StevensSavageduckEric Stevensnospam
"Maximum entropy method in image processing".
Naah. That's got nothing to do with image processing, at least not in your limited range of knowledge. But I bet there are guys at Adobe who understand all this.
i bet there are guys (and gals) at adobe who understand that a non-destructive workflow is reversible and laugh at all the bullshit being spewed here.
Here is a gal at Adobe who understands the concept of a non-destructive workflow. <http://www.jkost.com/lightroom.html>
And here is an Adobe guy who knows about entropy. http://www.adobe.com/devnet/adobe-media-server/articles/h264_encoding.html Scroll down to find the heading "Entropy Encoding".
that has absolutely nothing to do with a non-destructive workflow and whether something is reversible.
Which is why your contributions to this thread have been meaningless noise.
anything other than a non-destructive workflow is noise.
that includes thermodynamics, physics, entropy, flat earth and whatever else was mentioned.
09/13/2014-
