Google| Subject | Re: Clobberin' Time... |
| From | Cryofax |
| Date | 09/13/2001 17:57 (09/13/2001 08:57) |
| Message-ID | <423506ec.0109130757.14efc897@posting.google.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.starwars.misc |
| Follows | Celaeno |
| Followups | Paul \"Duggy\" Duggan (2d, 15h & 27m) |
celaeno@shavenwookie.nospam.com (Celaeno) wrote in message news:<3b9f9692.11341929@news.world-online.no>...
CelaenoThat was a lot less bloody than a ground invasion. We were closely matched against Japan in WWII, we couldn't warn them or they'd have too much time to prepare for it and possibly stop it.
You will not evade me, Jack_Shappa@hotmail.com (Cryofax):Cryofax
"Paul \"Duggy\" Duggan" <jc122739@jcu.edu.au>wrote in message news:<Pine.OSF.4.21.0109120837310.3320-100000@marlin.jcu.edu.au>...CelaenoPaul \"Duggy\" DugganCryofax
And let's kill the families of murders... show them we won't put up with that sort of thing either.
So basically you're saying any other country should be allowed to sponsor activity that leads to civilian casualities, but we should never retaliate against them because we might hurt their "innocent" civilians? At least we'd have the decency to let them evacuate a city before we annihilate it.
Hiroshima. Nagasaki.
And you don't know that a government has knowingly sponsored this.We should not attack any country unless we know they were involved obviously. And by involved I mean they knew about it, payed for it, or harbored the terrorists that did it.
- Cryo
09/11/2001-
-
-
-
