Google| Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/06/2017 19:34 (04/06/2017 19:34) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-7b3585e15e58f5bbc7d4d24ad069ea72@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (1h & 18m) > Sandman |
In article <D50BC024.9D0E5%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Yup, since you have given no quantifiable data for your claim, just hot air and empty words.SnitSandmanSandmanSnit
Yes, the claim is "often", which to me sounds like it would add at least another 30-40% to the numbers, right? So that needs to be measured to be supported.
I gave multiple specific examples and never suggested any percentage.
Yet, you said "often" which isn't quantifiable.
And you responded by assuming "30-40%"
And if you want to keep your claims are unquantifiable then you are free to do so and we can ignore the claims as stated. ike with most of your claims.
In other words: you played your normal games and ignored evidence,What "evidence" is there for "often" do you imagine? Oh, nothing as usual? Well then, carry on making empty claims. It's what you do best.
-- Sandman
03/31/2017-
-
-
