Skip to main content
news

Re: spreadsheet ergonomics

Sandman
Google Google
SubjectRe: spreadsheet ergonomics
FromSandman
Date04/07/2017 16:22 (04/07/2017 16:22)
Message-ID<sandman-d509601c823c858f650a7b75282a772b@individual.net>
Client
Newsgroupscomp.os.linux.advocacy
PGPSandman
FollowsSnit
In article <D50BF3C9.9D158%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:

Sandman
Yet, you said "often" which isn't quantifiable.

Snit
And you responded by assuming "30-40%"

Sandman
Yup,

Snit
Meaning you ignored the evidence and moved goal posts. You lied.

Sandman
No evidence was posted

Snit
That you will accept.

None has been posted.

Automatic reinsertion of snipped text by Snit: ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Meaning you ignored the evidence and moved goal posts. You lied.

No evidence was posted, even after having requested it several time. You just snip the requests and pretend you have provided something you have not. Same old, same old.

What you had to snip and run from:

Yup, since you have given no quantifiable data for your claim, just hot air and empty words.

And if you want to keep your claims are unquantifiable then you are free to do so and we can ignore the claims as stated. ike with most of your claims.

In other words: you played your normal games and ignored evidence,

What "evidence" is there for "often" do you imagine? Oh, nothing as usual? Well then, carry on making empty claims. It's what you do best. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Snippage reinserter v1.0

-- Sandman