Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Steve Carroll |
Date | 04/10/2017 00:48 (04/09/2017 15:48) |
Message-ID | <304c097a-5f41-457f-ab91-3612d652ae3d@googlegroups.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | vallor |
vallorI'm right about one other thing, the fact that he's repeatedly asked to be shown proof of his "wrongs" only to disingenuously label the people that give him what he wants as "obsessed". I also don't believe I'm wrong in stating that the guy is an *off the chart*, attention seeking narcissist, the likes of which most of us have never seen.
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017 11:25:31 -0700, Snit wrote:Snitvallor
Would be different if I was mentioned 1.5% of the time someone was mentioned... but 1.5% of ALL words. I have to say that is just sick. Yeah, higher than I would have expected... unbelievable how much COLA is obsessed with me.
Don't flatter yourself. Attributions (including those quoted) will contribute to that total far more than direct mentions do. (And if he's tallying what appears in headers, it will include your own posts, too.) And Carroll is right about one thing -- you are all over COLA threads like ants at a picnic.