Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Snit |
Date | 04/03/2017 20:48 (04/03/2017 11:48) |
Message-ID | <D507E6F4.9C820%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Sandman |
Followups | Sandman (3h & 11m) > Snit |
SandmanShow support for this claim of yours.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D506ECD1.9C62B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
And, clearly, you are not willing to call him on that. You will not call Sandman out on his lies either. Nor those of anyone in the herd. You simply value that acceptance more than you do truth.
I'm curious,
this "the herd" you keep talking about. It's every single regular in cola, isn't it?Is that a claim or a question?
What regular in cola *isn't* in the supposed "herd"? Could we get a list of regular posters that are not part of this "herd"?Show support anyone is not. Or anyone is. Remember, this is YOUR game, I am just playing it.
While we can't find a single regular poster in cola that ever agrees with you on anything,What If I agreed with that. Then you and I would agree and this would be an example of you lying.
maybe there are some you consider upstanding posters? Your entire "herd" claims ring empty when they encompass every other poster, making you out to be the single only "non-herd" person in cola. I'm sure there is psychology term for that kind of labelling :)I have repeatedly posted some criteria for what it means to be a part of the herd... but here you are asking me to repeat it.