Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Snit |
Date | 04/05/2017 04:46 (04/04/2017 19:46) |
Message-ID | <D509A8AF.9CCC8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | owl |
Followups | owl (58m) > Snit |
So in your mind when you download a tarball you are not downloading the contents of it? Interesting perspective. Just so you can see how macOS protects you from such things:owlSnitSnitowl
Interesting Linux does not offer such protections. I would have thought it would.
That's for downloaded files.
Which is what I did... downloaded them.
No, you downloaded a tarball that contained those files.
I mean the files in the tarball. I figured, incorrectly, that the permissions would not allow people to so easily accidently run arbitrary code. Really I should have known better.Snitowl
I did not think Linux had the same type of protection as macOS here... not sure why I was thinking the permissions would be changed. My mistake on that.
As you can see, the perms *are* changed, so I'm not sure what you're saying here.
I incorrectly assumed common sense from you... another mistake on my part. Sure.owlSnitowlUnlike with Numbers. Who knows what that Numbers does behind the scenes. You choose to trust a corporation that refuses to cooperate with law enforcement.Snit
So you have no concern running scripts from any source.
I never said that.
Whew. And as we have seen it would be unwise to take your advice on a "real" system... the risk of lost data is real simply to rename files.
No, what we have seen is that it would be unwise to hire you to write up a specification.