Subject | Snit digest 387 / 2017-04-05 |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/05/2017 10:21 (04/05/2017 10:21) |
Message-ID | <sandman-044668a153f2ac89df1407f888c986ea@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (7h & 14m) > Sandman |
SnitIt took you 11 years to understand that my CSS was and is generated dynamically? Wow, you're not a quick reader.
[2367] Ah, so the error, you say, came from an automated process.
[2368] But that does not explain why it was consistently there for [2368] some time then NOT there after I noted it..[X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t)
[2369] How do you explain that.I don't need to explain any of your lies, Snit. They're your lies, not mine.
[2370] And why have you been denying it was there for years?.[X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh)
[2371] And this is what you lied about.[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m)
[2372] And this is what you did...[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m)
[2373] you accused me of lying even though it has been proved I was right..[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) [X] Unsubstantiated refutations (http://tinyurl.com/gnxvqsf)
[2374] So you admitted your CSS on your home page did not validate and have [2374] just been denying it ever since!.[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) [X] Obfuscation (http://tinyurl.com/hhg8ezh)