Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Snit |
Date | 04/06/2017 03:48 (04/05/2017 18:48) |
Message-ID | <D50AEC8E.9CF81%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | owl |
Followups | owl (6m) > Snit |
owlProviding USERS with the results is the primary function -- without the presentation there is little value to a spreadsheet. You keep leaving the user out of the equation as to the value of a computer... but the computer exists to serve the user.
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snitowl
On 4/5/17, 5:12 PM, in article azcv003gabu.dji@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:
...
So absolutely, without a doubt, the different tables on the sheet serve a FUNCTIONAL purpose... one that is key to the tool being used.owlSnit
There is not one thing at the cell level that can be done in a sheet or table that cannot be done with the other.
Or by hand. Sure. So?owlSnit
If you insist otherwise, then name the numerical functions that are unavailable to one but available to the other.
You started by asking for the FUNCTIONAL difference between the two. Now you want to know the COMPUTATIONAL difference.
Computation is the primary function of a spreadsheet. I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but making flyers takes a backseat.
The discussion here was about Numbers! No other spreadsheet that allows for multiple tables on a sheet has even been mentioned.Snitowl
That is easy, too!
A sheet offers ZERO capability to do ANY numerical function without the addition of a table. ALL calculations are done in tables. ALL.
LOL! Have you ever used any other spreadsheet besides Numbers?