Snit
On 4/6/17, 5:20 AM, in article k1ccecdkarnd6go8sgi2l2g26vrofvdeag@4ax.com, "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid>wrote:

chrisv
Sandman wrote:

Sandman
some thing wrote:

Snit
Look at Carroll and his "gluey" and the "he who shall not be named" and the "the thing" and more.

Sandman
I can't "look" at anything because you provided no substantiation to look at. Only mere claims. So you have two claims that need support:

"What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory nicknames"

What "nicknames"?

"as they do so often..."

How often is that?

chrisv
Well, you must concede that the thing is sometimes mentioned, without using its name.

Snit
Including in this post and many others, some of which I pointed out just yesterday. No need to dig through the past. No need for databases. No need for anything but actually looking at the posts on COLA. But Sandman will ALWAYS deny evidence. He will ALWAYS lie when the truth does not fit his trolling nonsense. Then when that is pointed out he uses his scripted trolling tools to track his own trolling and then blame others (mostly me... he is STILL pissed from over a decade ago that I pointed out an error on his site he wanted to deny he made but for which he STILL corrected). Over a decade of him crying about THAT one thing. He is almost as sick as the stalker you mention below.

chrisv
However, if the obsessed Carroll is excluded, those mentions are not very frequent, and would be quite rare, if the thing would only stop trolling (or, better yet, drop dead).

Snit
This was proved false when I stopped posting entirely for a month