Google| Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
| From | Sandman |
| Date | 04/05/2017 09:57 (04/05/2017 09:57) |
| Message-ID | <sandman-1b6730e4792f5ab7f0bce73431199a0d@individual.net> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| PGP | Sandman |
| Follows | Snit |
| Followups | Snit (8h & 2m) > Sandman |
In article <D5091832.9CA35%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
Those would be irrelevant to this data, since it shows how often you mention their names, i.e. how obsessed you are of the regulars in cola, not the other way around.SandmanDFS
What is the quantifiable measurement of my "obsession" this time? Can't be "responses" because you respond to me as much as I do to you. Can't be "mentions" because you mention me far more than I mention you.
How are you counting 'mentions'?Do you count every 'Sandman' as a mention, or just one per post that has your name in it?Sandman
One per post.SnitDFSSandman
Do you count this post of yours as a Snit 'mention'? You didn't type 'Snit', but it's a reply to Snit, and his name is in the attribution
Then it's a response, not a mention. Your post would be a Snit mention.
What about when those who troll me refer to me with derogatory nicknames
as they do so often...Got any data to support that claim? No? Figures.
-- Sandman
03/31/2017-
-
-
