Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/05/2017 23:34 (04/05/2017 23:34) |
Message-ID | <sandman-7b827dd3ef81998275ddc172fbcee32e@individual.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
PGP | Sandman |
Follows | Snit |
[X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m)SandmanDFS
What is the quantifiable measurement of my "obsession" this time? Can't be "responses" because you respond to me as much as I do to you. Can't be "mentions" because you mention me far more than I mention you.
How are you counting 'mentions'?Do you count every 'Sandman' as a mention, or just one per post that has your name in it?Do you count this post of yours as a Snit 'mention'? You didn't type 'Snit', but it's a reply to Snit, and his name is in the attributionSnit
Sandman makes things up and then tailors his posts to his stats...
such as counting new threads but not his renamed threadsThese stats are about responses and mentions, not threads. What on earth are you on about?
or counting mentions by direct name ("Snit" and "Sandman") so then he refers to me by other names.Only, the stats under discussion doesn't even count number of times "Snit" has been mentioned. You are again talking about something completely different than the stats show.
Meanwhile it is obvious he is obsessing over me and trolling meOnly, I don't go around talking about you in responses to others any way near the same amount you do about me, or others in cola. You have a big unhealthy obsession with a number of posters in cola, and you can't keep yourself from talking about them everywhere.
(as are others who troll COLA). When asked for evidence I happily provided itYou have yet to provide evidence for any claim.