Google| Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
| From | Snit |
| Date | 04/03/2017 23:33 (04/03/2017 14:33) |
| Message-ID | <D5080DA2.9C8BD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
| Client | |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Follows | Sandman |
| Followups | Sandman (36m) > Snit |
On 4/3/17, 2:29 PM, in article sandman-65aaf1713581cfa5bd246b81b5bbddbb@individual.net, "Sandman" <mr@sandman.net>wrote:
SandmanIf those who troll COLA are not obsessing over me, lying about me, and begging for my attention then why are there so many examples of them doing so?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
In article <D5080A53.9C89D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:SnitSandman
LOL! Sandman is creating whole lists of BS accusations
Lie #1SnitSandman
demanding they should be accepted unless I refute them.
Lie #2SnitSandman
Comes down to Sandman is going FAR out of his way to prove me right about his obsession over me.
What is the quantifiable measurement of my "obsession" this time? Can't be "responses" because you respond to me as much as I do to you. Can't be "mentions" because you mention me far more than I mention you.
So what is it, then? In what way can you show me that I am more obsessed about you than you are about me?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJY4r7LAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRmrwIALMfRMIQ7+CiRSW8HVQ5bP3V Uxht8z1ZeFTmJZB6eWbxXsf17y1O6SfXv/OmYV0+3RHvCkvUxibTVnU6U4FXdjq5 qxYDv3srZeNpb9VMZurI/849tESGtxwt2baUwJP4QkZITZZ2Mvn2iRSYMWB/04cb YmZJV71e/VrreglKzonruZQw7ASzCak2fjkzohe48ZySZBz7v5ajp70KLyR3ydgz CiEFDMWZJIUU0HF+TkDl905k9oI0JT7MKv0eqgqhc7UGwDz5SwgfSVhku950e7zB EErV/ch1NOr1oOVQYh39fkBJ1myt1l2RMKs3BH+cS8gKhRqnq+pVLaX7f4vbRvU>=w1A+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
03/31/2017-
-
-
