Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Snit |
Date | 04/08/2017 08:44 (04/07/2017 23:44) |
Message-ID | <D50DD4D0.9DB22%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | owl |
owlHmmm, a sub-table? It does seem it uses the term inconsistently. Odd.
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snitowl
On 4/7/17, 10:57 PM, in article ahvu003.ak3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:
...Snitowl
Right... you can sort RANGES. ----- @index(e,r)
Use the value of the expression e to index into the range r. The numeric value at that position is returned. The value 1 selects the first item in the range, 2 selects the second item, etc. R should be either a single row or a single column. -----
I wonder why snipped this part about the index() function:
"With three arguments, the range must come first, and the second and third arguments will then be interpreted as row and column, respectively, for indexing into a two-dimensional table."
I've had enough of your bullshit. Plonk.LOL! You just do not like I called you out on your claim that a range of cells is a table and not, well, a range. There are times, as I showed with Excel, where a range can be treated like a table... and maybe they are trying to use this meaning in the sc documents. They should have a glossary!