Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | owl |
Date | 04/05/2017 00:38 (04/04/2017 22:38) |
Message-ID | <ahbiz003.buyr@rooftop.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | Snit |
Followups | Snit (2h & 26m) > owl |
SnitI've already shown that.
On 4/4/17, 1:49 PM, in article avz003.ahbu3@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:owlSnit
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snitowl
On 4/3/17, 9:45 PM, in article zb3ugoa00.aulu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:
...SnitowlowlSnit
You haven't shown any benefit to that.
Sure I have... it allows you to group logically separate concepts into separate tables on the same sheet, it allows you to have data where columns do not line up, etc. I focused on this in the video on the magic spell calculation.
And I do all of that using separate windows, possibly embedded into a single window.
So show it... including the creation process. THAT will show the benefits you are missing... the ease of use.
Here's a creation process for you:
https://vid.me/pG0C
zero to 52000 tables in 2.57 seconds. Each with locked labels and formulas. Instantaneous jump to any table.
But you will not show the type work we have been doing with multiple tables all showing and being interrelated and updating automatically?
You don't get to change the specification after the fact. It is your responsibility to detail everything you expect from a solution.SnitowlSnitWith YOUR suggestion, with an open source tool, we saw the hazard: an unknowing person could have lost data. Twice.owl
We saw you move the goalposts beyond the specifications.
Yeah, I merely noted I wanted an open file to be renamed
And that specification was met.
Very, very poorly, sure (as shown by the context I have returned... which you snipped). Really, you offered no REASONABLE solution.