Subject | Re: spreadsheet ergonomics |
From | Snit |
Date | 04/05/2017 17:23 (04/05/2017 08:23) |
Message-ID | <D50A59FB.9CE15%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
Follows | owl |
Followups | owl (5h & 43m) > Snit |
owlIf sc uses different definitions than what I have been using that is fine... but I have been very clear what I mean by a "sheet" and a "table". From what I understand sc has nothing similar to the concept of a "sheet" at all.
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snitowl
On 4/4/17, 9:14 PM, in article ac03ga.hubu32@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:owlSnit
Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>wrote:Snitowl
On 4/4/17, 7:05 PM, in article javz903.abu@rooftop.invalid, "owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid>wrote:owlSnit
How long does it take in Numbers to create a sheet with 52000 tables with locked formulas and labels (A-Z with 2000 tables in each column, each table with a label{#} at the top, and a sum the bottom, summing 10 rows)? And how long does it take to navigate to a specific such table?
2.57 seconds here with sc.
Already answered this... but, on re-reading I would like to see you do this... and then to show "a sheet" with the tables on it. Would be interesting to see.
I already posted a video of it.
Missed it. Can you show the link... ONE sheet with tons of tables. Would like to see it.
I smell an argument about tables vs sheets coming on...
Anyway, here's the original vid: https://vid.me/pG0CYou ran a script which you had already pre-written... which is fine but somehow you forgot to mention that. :)
Here's a current screenshot with better spacing: http://imgur.com/a/ZhGwv-- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.