Skip to main content
news

Re: Any Minolta/Sony users ...

Alan Browne
SubjectRe: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP?
FromAlan Browne
Date04/26/2014 16:32 (04/26/2014 10:32)
Message-ID<NMqdnY4tsYcPXsbOnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
Client
Newsgroupsrec.photo.digital
Followsnospam

On 2014.04.20, 19:45 , nospam wrote:

nospam
In article <b-qdnUuFUvwIp8nOnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews.com>, Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca>wrote:

PeterN
The only time you might see a difference would be if there were colors in the LAB spectrum that are not in the RGB spectrum, and those differences would rarely be noticable in a photograph.

Alan Browne
A good point - but nospam's contention is conversion differences.

Let's color the situation. The files were taken from raw, reduced in size, saved as TIFF in each RGB and Lab. Re-loaded and compared (differenced). There is not a hint of delta.

http://tinyurl.com/m35p59t RGB

http://tinyurl.com/mldetvx Lab

http://tinyurl.com/mvl6vwj Diff

nospam
there's a difference there too.

i did: image/duplicate, append -converted to the name. image/mode/lab image/mode/rgb image/calculations, original on top, converted below, subtract mode

optionally, just before the calculation step, switch between the two images while looking at the histogram palette. there's a difference. then do the calculation step.

I have yet to see your proof of discernible (visible) changes in conversion from RGB to Lab in PS. Still in the queue is it?

-- "Big data can reduce anything to a single number, but you shouldn’t be fooled by the appearance of exactitude." -Gary Marcus and Ernest Davis, NYT, 2014.04.07