nospam
In article <lin3e802eq7@news1.newsguy.com>, PeterN <peter.newnospam@verizon.net>wrote:

PeterN
So now you know what I do. My original claim stands. Your statement about the learning curve of PC & LR could only be made either by somone who has not really used them, or who is a compplete bullshiter. I was wrong in giving you thebenefit of the doubt.

nospam
no. you were just wrong, and still are.

as i said, ask those who use both apps. they'll tell you what i'm telling you.

PeterN
I use both, and I agree that LR streamlines the workflow.

nospam
tell that to tony

PeterN
But PS is not easy to learn, and I had a short learning curve to adapt to LR.

nospam
the workflow is slightly different but the payoff is huge

PeterN
But since you like quick and dirty processing, why don't you use the many color curves in LAB. Ater all you can apply a curve into a channel in LAB and get far more precise results than you can in ACR.

nospam
i don't like working in lab and do not find any advantage whatsoever, both in results and workflow.

dan marguilis is one of the biggest proponents of the workflow, and after reading his book, i was very unimpressed. it all can be done in rgb just as easily and likely with better results because you skip two conversions (which are not lossless).