Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | nospam |
Date | 04/14/2014 04:33 (04/13/2014 22:33) |
Message-ID | <130420142233218441%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Tony Cooper |
Followups | Tony Cooper (1h & 19m) > nospam |
the burden is with the app they do use.nospamTony Cooper
lightroom was written to increase productivity of photographers by providing all of the common tasks photographers do in one place, without burdening them with stuff they'll rarely or never use (although there are ways to do those on the off chance they do).
it succeeds in doing that.
What is the "burden" of features of a program that someone doesn't use? A burden is something that slows you down or causes you some inconvenience.
PS allows working in CMYK. I've never worked in CMYK. Is it a burden for me to use a program that contains a feature that I don't use?why include what isn't used? the user pays for it and the code takes up space even though it won't be used and it is potentially confusing if the user doesn't know what it's for.
LR does not have the "stuff" that many people do use.completely wrong. statements like this shows just how little you understand about what lightroom does and how it works.
I think it's a burden to have to open a file in PS to be able to use the clone tool.so does adobe, which is why they included a clone tool in lightroom.
It's a burden I'm willing to live with because of the other advantages of using LR, but the idea that we are burdened if there are features we don't use in a program is just more bullshit.again, statements like this shows just how little you understand about what lightroom does and how it works.