Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Sandman |
Date | 04/19/2014 17:38 (04/19/2014 17:38) |
Message-ID | <slrnll568d.hne.mr@irc.sandman.net> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | Eric Stevens (9h & 53m) |
But the troll offered up only two options, that it was either "creaky and useless" or that it was "ineffective".Eric StevensEric Stevensnospam
Have you not noticed the paen of praise for the enormous effect Light Room has had on his work flow emerging from nospam?
that doesn't mean what i did before was ineffective. that's nothing but a straw man.
'Effectiveness' or 'ineffectiveness' is a matter of relativity.
No, just less effective.nospamEric Stevens
before lightroom, my workflow was the best it could be at the time, given what was available.
And compared with your post-Lightroom work flow it was relatively ineffective.
So you agree with Tony that his workflow before Lightroom was either "creaky and useless" or "ineffective"nospamEric Stevens
after lightroom, my workflow became more productive.
I can accept that.