Subject | Re: Any Minolta/Sony users using UFRaw and GIMP? |
From | Floyd L. Davidson |
Date | 04/08/2014 12:11 (04/08/2014 02:11) |
Message-ID | <87ioqk5dws.fld@barrow.com> |
Client | |
Newsgroups | rec.photo.digital |
Follows | Eric Stevens |
Followups | nospam (2h & 52m) |
Eric Stevens"Clark Vision have published articles describing their tests with all these things using Photoshop. See for example"
On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 17:54:30 -0800, floyd@apaflo.com (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote:Floyd L. DavidsonEric Stevens
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid>wrote:nospamFloyd L. Davidson
In article <87a9byohta.fld@apaflo.com>, Floyd L. Davidson <floyd@apaflo.com>wrote:nospamEric StevensFloyd L. Davidson
Clark Vision have published articles describing their tests with all these things using Photoshop. See for example http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/image-restoration2/index.html>
Read it a little closer Eric, Roger Clark did not use PhotoShop for Richardson-Lucy Deconvolutional sharpening, he also didn't even mention the Wavelet sharpening that I have previously commented on.
read it closer yourself. what he *didn't* use was the gimp.
Nobody said he used GIMP. But Eric said he used Photoshop, which was not even close to true.
I did not say the article I cited described how he did all these things with photoshop. I said he has published 'articles' (note plural) and cited this one as an example.